FixPeek LogoFixPeek
How It WorksPricingForumGet Audit
FixPeek LogoFixPeek

Expert-led conversion audits that reveal what's blocking your sales.

Company

About UsContact UsForum

Popular Forum Categories

Advertising DiscussionsCopywriting DiscussionsMarket Analysis Discussions

Service

PricingHow It WorksGet AuditAcademy
Privacy PolicyTerms of UseCookies PolicyRefund Policy

© 2025 FixPeek. All rights reserved.

Forum

Categories

/Advertising
Question

As a beginner, should I test more creatives or more audiences first?

Posted by •11/20/2025
I have a limited ad budget and I don't know where to put my testing focus.

Some people say:
- “Creatives are 80% of results, test as many as possible”
Others say:
- “Audience targeting is everything, test a bunch of interests/lookalikes”

My situation:
- Budget: about $20–$30/day
- Niche: pet grooming
- I have:
- 3 video creatives
- 2 image creatives
- A bunch of possible interests to target

Questions:
1. For a small budget, is it smarter to:
- Keep audience broad and test many creatives?
- Or keep a few creatives and test many audiences?
2. What does your **simple** testing structure look like when you launch a new product?

4 Replies

•11/20/2025
Makes sense. I’ll keep audiences simple and put my energy into testing different hooks and creatives instead of drowning in a list of 30 interests. Thanks for the clear explanation.
•11/20/2025
I wasted a lot of money testing 15 different interests with the same boring ad.

When I finally made 3 completely different hooks (problems, angles, opening lines), I got my first profitable day with just BROAD + one pet interest.
•11/20/2025
A simple rule I use:

- If CTR < 1% almost everywhere → creative problem
- If CTR is good but ROAS is bad → landing page / offer problem
- If CTR & CVR are good but scaling breaks things → then play with audiences and structure

Most beginners skip straight to “advanced audience strategies” when they’ve never truly tested 3–5 different hooks in their creatives.
•11/20/2025
Short answer: **test creatives first**.

Why:
- Meta’s algorithm is very good at finding people who might buy **if your ad is good**.
- A bad creative in 20 audiences is still a bad creative.
- A strong creative in 1–2 broad audiences often beats “interest stacking” chaos.

With your budget, I’d do:

- 3–4 ad sets:
- 2 broad (no interests, just country + age + gender)
- 2 simple interests (e.g. “Dogs”, “Dog grooming”)
- Inside each ad set:
- Same 3–4 creatives

Let Meta tell you:
- Which creative gets best CTR / cheapest clicks
- Then you can kill losers and duplicate winners into new setups later.

Once you have a clearly winning creative, you can:
- Try new audiences (countries, age brackets, interests)
- But don’t get lost in 20 tiny ad sets with weak ads.